The marketing and promotion of British food and drink must be improved in order to reach a wider audience. For businesses in England who want to start or boost exporting, the current postcode lottery of regional support is unfavorable. We applaud the sector for taking the initiative to make this better with the proposed Food and Drink Manufacturing Sector Deal proposal. However, government strategy must support this.
The Government ought to make public its Shared Prosperity Fund consultation. The consultation should contain recommendations for boosting the competitiveness of SMEs with a sector breakdown that includes the manufacturing of food and beverages. The UK Government should consider what it can learn from the support given by the Devolved Governments to SMEs in their countries when developing new support for English businesses.
Any business, no matter where it is located, will receive support from the government for exporting. There is a vast network of over 240 International Trade Advisers in England, many of whom have specialized knowledge in food and drink, and we continuously examine our service to ensure that it offers the proper offer to businesses throughout England.
Based on the distribution and density of businesses in the areas, we provide regional financing to our English teams. Compared to other European nations, the UK has significant regional productivity inequalities. To assist establish prosperous communities across the UK, we are continuing to develop the Northern Powerhouse and the Midlands Engine regions, for instance. We acknowledge that different policies will be required for various locations; regional methods can aid in expanding skilled labor pools, stimulating competitiveness, and enhancing market access.
In the UK, every region has a part to play in growing the overall economy. In order to increase productivity, we will build on the solid foundations laid by our city’s growth and devolution agreements and continue to collaborate with local authorities.
The government’s export assistance will provide a level playing field for all UK enterprises, particularly the SMEs that dominate the country’s food and beverage industry. Naturally, we respect our partnership with the devolved administrations and rely on their knowledge to make sure the interests of their companies are taken into account when the government promotes trade and investment.
The UK Shared Prosperity Fund and local growth funding’s future must be made clear, according to the government, who recognizes its importance. We have already done 25 engagement events around the UK and will consult widely on the fund. A variety of corporate representatives attended these and had the chance to voice their opinions and contribute to the creation of policies.
Promoting British food and drink overseas requires attending international trade events. The Tradeshow Access Programme (TAP) is regarded by the industry as a crucial tool for enterprises, especially SMEs, looking to expand into new markets. We acknowledge that there may have been adequate justifications for the budget’s minor drop up until 2016. The Government should have foreseen the increasing need for British enterprises to access and advertise themselves to new markets, nevertheless, in the wake of the EU referendum. Instead, as part of a continuous trend of reduced financing, TAP spending on food and drink has plummeted by 10% since 2017–18. Grant opportunities for businesses have grown more limited, however we appreciate the growing emphasis on SME
The Tradeshow Access Programme has to be quickly evaluated in cooperation with industry and trade organisations given the government’s export goals. In the next Spending Review, funding has to be examined and maybe boosted.
The Government should explain why the TAP budget has been underspent each year since 2014–15 in its response to our Report, especially given that the number of grants available per company has decreased. The total TAP budget for all sectors is 온라인카지노사이트 in accordance with the decision made in the most recent Spending Review. The amount spent on events in the food and beverage sector is in line with the total TAP budget.
We consistently assess the performance of our services and programs to make sure they produce the best results for UK businesses. To make sure we are obtaining the most benefit and value from TAP, we are now doing an independent evaluation of it. Customer demand drives TAP spending. The amount actually spent depends on how many applicants across the program are accepted. 313 events received funding from the TAP program for 2018–19, while 3,256 SME enterprises received funds. The TAP program for 2019–20 is anticipated to sponsor 255 events and award funds to 3384 SME companies.
Market access and sustaining continuing discussion about British food and drink have benefited from having a professional food and agriculture specialist on the ground in China. We anticipate this presence in China to continue since commerce and diplomatic ties take time to develop. We are pleased with the steps the government is taking to boost the number of these specialists in other important markets.
Currently, 90% of the Food and Agriculture Counselor in China is funded by the AHDB. However, because the AHDB is a levy-supported organization, this means that the position is primarily funded by British food and farming firms with an emphasis on raw agricultural commodities. This has created helpful synergies. However, exporting branded and value-added goods is another area where the UK excels. We advise that the Government and the larger food and drink industries co-fund Food and Agriculture Counselors in other markets, even if the AHDB should continue to give some money.
The Committee’s recognition by the Government that ongoing discussions and talks with Chinese authorities have resulted in higher exports and improved access for food and drink goods pleases the Government. The Government additionally acknowledges the significance of the Agricultural Counselor’s and their team’s contribution in China in accomplishing these results.
The Chinese Food and Agriculture Counselor job will continue to be studied by the government as an example and a model for success. We are collaborating with the business community to determine the priority nations where comparable assistance can help UK food and beverage exports. We support the Committee’s decision and will work to persuade other sectors of the food and beverage industry to contribute to funding additional international jobs under the Food and Drink Sector Deal.
based in the UK India Business Council, is India. A similar position, which is entirely sponsored by the government, is also being recruited for in the United Arab Emirates. Unfortunately, aside from AHDB members, too few British exporters are aware of the work done by the Food and Agriculture Counselor in China. In addition to hiring more counselors, the government should make sure that their existence is better understood, especially by SMEs. The counsellors should at the very least be mentioned on the websites of each embassy as well as the new export portal suggested by the Sector Deal. They should also frequently attend conferences and events for the UK food and beverage industry.
The government has a vast network of resources available to SMEs wishing to export, including both inexperienced exporters and seasoned experts. This assistance may be accessed on great.gov.uk and can range from basic market data to detailed assistance from local delivery partners, international trade advisors, and staff in British consulates and embassies abroad.
Compared to other industries, we get more inquiries. Naturally, it’s crucial to make sure our employees operating in foreign locations are focusing on the tasks that will have the biggest impact. We have a successful triage system as a result, allowing us to manage our inquiries effectively.
The Government will think about the best ways to inform businesses about the various resources it has available, including those in abroad posts, so that they can get the best guidance and assistance.
Additionally, the government sends numerous officials from its abroad posts to important food and drink trade exhibitions including SIAL (Paris), ANUGA (Cologne), and IFE (London), where they provide guidance on conducting business in the nations where they are situated. Exporters can also interact directly with local buyers, who frequently have staff from abroad, at specialized “Meet the Buyer” events across the UK organized by DIT.
The AHDB carries out market research and advertises British food, focusing on both home and foreign markets. This is both welcome and ambitious. The AHDB’s current evaluation should take into account whether the financing split between local and international market intelligence and promotion is appropriate for the long term and satisfies levy payer needs. In order to advertise to the home market, AHDB should determine whether extra work is necessary. In order to prevent these two distinct, significant markets from fighting for resources from the same pot, the government should also explore the argument for separating responsibility for marketing to the domestic market from that for the abroad market.
In the ten years that AHDB has been around, the sector has undergone a lot of change. Defra conducted a Request for Views last autumn to provide stakeholders a chance to voice their thoughts on the future of AHDB. The results analysis was put on hold so that resources could be shifted to no deal planning. However, work has now resumed, and during the summer, a summary of replies will be published.
This will influence how the government decides to move forward. We want to make sure that the organization that comes out of this assessment suits the industry’s concerns and provides for its long-term demands. Henry Dimbleby, the top Non-Executive Director for Defra, has been tasked by the Government with leading an Independent Review and formulating recommendations that would guide a National Geographic.
The plan will contribute to ensuring that our food system provides nutritious and reasonably priced food and is supported by a robust and sustainable agricultural industry. The National Food Strategy will include production, marketing, processing, sale, and purchasing of food as well as the full food chain from farm to fork.
It is crucial for the UK to preserve commerce with current nations and the EU while also opening new markets for food and drink. While there has been improvement in some areas, we are worried that the government’s marketing and export strategy is not bold or strategic enough. Market access and rising exports do not occur overnight, so urgent effort is needed. The food and beverage business is aware of the steps that must be taken to boost export activity. The Food and Drink Manufacturing Sector Deal should be quickly approved by the government, and a timeline for its implementation should be established.
The Government is dedicated to collaborating with business to raise aspiration and opportunity in the industry. This comprises the Food and Drink Sector Council, which strives to define a forward-looking agenda to increase productivity, as well as the Food and Drink Sector Deal and a particular working group on exports. Although formal negotiations are still ongoing, because business and government are concentrating on the EU exit at the moment, the pace of activity has slowed. When the circumstances change, we’ll try to increase the negotiation’s momentum and move the suggestions along as rapidly as we can.